<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Payame Noor University (PNU)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Control and Optimization in Applied Mathematics</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2383-3130</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparison of Some MCDM Techniques in a Hesitant Fuzzy Environment</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>33</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>63</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">12693</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30473/coam.2026.74974.1318</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Harmandeep</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kaur</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Mathematics, Akal University, Talwandi Sabo (151302), Punjab, India</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sukhpreet</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kaur Sidhu</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Mathematics, Akal University, Talwandi Sabo (151302), Punjab, India</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-0083-4526</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>30</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract> Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) often involves situations characterized by uncertainty, ambiguity, and vagueness. To address such complexities, MCDM techniques play a crucial role. This paper presents a comparative analysis of two widely used methods—Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR)—within a hesitant fuzzy environment. Hesitant fuzzy sets allow decision-makers to express hesitation by assigning multiple possible membership values to an element rather than a single value. In this framework, the TOPSIS ranks alternatives based on their closeness to the positive and negative ideal solutions, while the VIKOR identifies a compromise solution by balancing individual and collective regret measures. The effectiveness of the comparison is demonstrated through illustrative numerical examples. Moreover, some real life applications of these methods are discussed.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">multi-criteria decision-making</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Fuzzy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Hesitant fuzzy set</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">TOPSIS</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">VIKOR</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Kendall’s rank correlation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Decision uncertainty</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://mathco.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_12693_35b19290a043167aa43ba0eee5ea6918.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
