Thank you for choosing the journal of "Control and Optimization in Applied Mathematics - COAM" for your reviewing and cooperation:
We are pleased to ask all researchers who wish to cooperate as a reviewer of the COAM's articles to contact the editor-in-chief of the COAM. They can submit their request by Journal's Email: email@example.com
How to become a reviewer?
It's not really a question of becoming a reviewer. Most people are invited by the Editor of a journal to conduct a review. An Editor may approach you because you are a specialist in a certain field or research topic.
Still, If you think you would be a good reviewer for a specific journal you can always contact the journal's Editor.
Locate the journal you need to review for
You are notified by e-mail when an Editor or Editorial Office invites you to review a submission for a journal. Once you have agreed to review it, an email with further instructions will be sent to you.
If you do not remember for which journal you have been invited to review, please contact Customer Support with your name and e-mail address.
Forgotten your username and password to review a paper
Normally you enter your username and password to log in to JCOAM to review a paper by clicking on the login link on your journal's JCOAM homepage. If you have forgotten your login details, go to the forgotten username/password link on your journal's homepage. For more information please visit our site.
Papers are sent to reviewers for their peer-review process. The reviewers' recommendations determine whether a paper will be accepted / accepted subject to change / subject to resubmission with significant changes / rejected.
For papers that require changes, the same reviewers will be used to ensure that the quality of the revised paper is acceptable. All papers are refereed, and the Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to refuse any typescript, whether on invitation or otherwise, and to make suggestions and/or modifications before publication.
All submitted articles should report original, previously unpublished research results, experimental or theoretical.
The review process in this journal is double-blind peer review.
The Editorial Office