In collaboration with Payame Noor University and the Iranian Society of Instrumentation and Control Engineers

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Mathematics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, Indonesia

2 Department of Data Science, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Lampung, 35365, Indonesia

10.30473/coam.2025.75192.1322

Abstract

In this study, we examine solutions to Optimal Tracking Control (OTC) problems for both Linear Quadratic (LQ) and nonlinear systems. Classical approaches to OTC rely on formulating and solving the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation, which typically requires numerical solutions of the state, co-state, and stationary equations using the forward-backward method. Such methods often involve intricate mathematical analysis and substantial computational effort. To address these challenges, we explored the use of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINN) as an alternative framework for solving OTC problems. The PINN approach is implemented by constructing a problem-specific loss function that directly incorporates the governing dynamics and control objectives. This method is comparatively simpler and more flexible to implement. The performance of PINNs is evaluated through quantitative error analysis and benchmarked against the classical Runge-Kutta (RK) method. A detailed comparison is presented using tabulated error metrics and time-domain plots of absolute errors. Numerical results demonstrate that PINNs achieve lower approximation errors than Runge-Kutta method for both LQ and nonlinear tracking problems, indicating their effectiveness as a viable alternative solution strategy for OTC problems. 

Highlights

  • Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are applied to optimal tracking control problems
  • Both linear quadratic and nonlinear tracking systems are addressed within a unified framework
  • PINNs eliminate the need for solving Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations
  • Superior tracking accuracy is achieved compared to the Runge–Kutta method
  • SiLU activation function yields the lowest tracking errors among tested activations
  • PINNs offer a flexible data-driven alternative for complex nonlinear control problems

Keywords

Main Subjects

[1] Ahmadin, A., Naiborhu, J., Mu’tamar, K. (2023). “Control design on a non-minimum phase bilinear system by output redefinition and particle swarm optimization method”. In: 2023 6th International Conference on Robotics, Control and Automation Engineering (RCAE), Suzhou, China IEEE., 201–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RCAE59706.2023.10398810
[2] Ali, I. (2025). “Data-driven machine learning approach based on physics-informed neural network for population balance model”. Advances in Continuous and Discrete Models, 2025(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-025-03876-1
[3] Beard, R.W., Saridis, G.N., Wen, J.T. (1997). “Galerkin approximations of the generalized Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation”. Automatica, 33(12), 2159–2177. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0005-1098(97)00128-3
[4] Bryson, A. E., Ho, Y. C. (1975). Applied optimal control, Taylor and Francis Group.
[5] Chen, X., Wang, F. (2021). “Neural-network-based stochastic linear quadratic optimal tracking control scheme for unknown discrete-time systems using adaptive dynamic programming”. Control Theory and Technology, 19(3), 315-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11768-021-00046-y
[6] Chu, H., Miyatake, Y., Cui, W., Wei, S., Furihata, D. (2024). “Structure-preserving physicsinformed neural networks with energy or Lyapunov structure”. Proceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-24), 3872-3880. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2024/428
[7] Cong, A., Jin, Y., Lu, Z., Gao, Q., Ge, X., Li, Z., Lin, R., Hu, X., Hou, L. (2025). “Transfer learning-based physics-informed DeepONets for the adaptive evolution of digital twin models for dynamic systems”. Nonlinear Dynamics, 113(15), 19075–19102. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11071-025-11158-4
[8] Devasia, S., Chen, D., Paden, B. (1996). “Nonlinear inversion-based output tracking”. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 41(7), 930-942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/9.508898
[9] Fabiani, G., Bollt, E., Siettos, C., Yannacopoulos, A.N. (2025). “Linear stability analysis of physics-informed random projection neural networks for ODEs”, arXiv. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2408.15393
[10] Feng, Y., Eun, J., Kim, S., Kim, Y.R. (2025). “Application of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) solution to coupled thermal and hydraulic processes in silty sands”. International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 16(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-025-00232-w
[11] Gao, B., Yao, R., Li, Y. (2025). “Physics-informed neural networks with adaptive loss weighting algorithm for solving partial differential equations”. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 181, 216-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2025.01.007
[12] Karniadakis, G.E., Kevrekidis, I.G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., Yang, L. (2021). “Physicsinformed machine learning”. Nature Reviews Physics, 3, 422–440. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1038/s42254-021-00314-5
[13] Lewis, F.L., Vrabie, D.L., Syrmos, V.L. (2012). “Optimal control”. 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, INC.
[14] Li, Y., Liu, L. (2024). “Physics-informed neural network-based nonlinear model predictive control for automated guided vehicle trajectory tracking”. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(10), 460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15100460
[15] Michałowska, K., Goswami, S., Karniadakis, G.E., Riemer-Sørensen, S. (2025). “Multi-resolution learning with DeepONets and long short-term memory neural networks”. Neurocomputing, 653, 131154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2025.131154
[16] Mu, C., Ni, Zh., Sun, C., He, H. (2017). “Air-breathing hypersonic vehicle tracking control based on adaptive dynamic programming”. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 28(3), 584-598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2516948
[17] Mu’tamar, K., Naiborhu, J., Saragih, R., Handayani, D. (2022). “Tracking control for planar nonminimum-phase bilinear control system with disturbance using backstepping”. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 26(3), 1315–1327. DOI: https://doi. org/10.11591/ijeecs.v26.i3.pp1315-1327
[18] Pratama, M. H. Y., Gunawan, A. Y. (2023). “Exploring physics-informed neural networks for solving boundary layer problems”. Journal of Fundamental Mathematics and Applications, 6(2), 101-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jfma.v6i2.20084
[19] Tang, G., Fan, M. (2008). “Series-based approximate approach of optimal tracking control for nonlinear systems with time-delay”. Progress in Natural Science, 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.03.033
[20] Wang, D., Liu, D., Wei, Q. (2012). “Finite-horizon neuro-optimal tracking control for a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems using adaptive dynamic programming approach”. Neurocomputing, 78(1), 14-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2011.03.058
[21] Wei, Q., Liu, D. (2014). “Adaptive dynamic programming for optimal tracking control of unknown nonlinear systems with application to coal gasification”. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 11, 1020-1036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2013.2284545
[22] Zerrougui, I., Li, Z., Hissel, D. (2025). “Physics-informed neural network for modeling and predicting temperature fluctuations in proton exchange membrane electrolysis”. Energy and AI, 20, 100474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100474
[23] Zhu, P., Liu, Z., Xu, Z., Lv, J. (2025). “An adaptive weight physics-informed neural network for vortex-induced vibration problems”. Buildings, 15(9), 1533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ buildings15091533